Under Obama, guest-worker visa policy creates left-right conflict
Non-resident visitors to the United States have their passports checked at immigration control after arriving at McCarran International Airport, Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2011, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)
Under
the Obama administration, skilled foreign professionals like doctors
and software engineers find dim hope in Emma Lazarus’s poetic lamp
lifted “beside the golden door.” These huddled, high tech masses
are, quite often, told by Washington policymakers to consider
launching their careers in other countries.
One
physician trained in South Africa, for example, recently applied for
a visa to work in the U.S. Despite the shortage of skilled doctors in
America, the Obama administration failed to grant him “extraordinary
worker” status. For him, there will be no work at a pharmaceutical
company, no hospital shifts, and no opportunity to start his own
consulting firm.
New
York City immigration attorney Andrew P. Johnson, who represented
that doctor, told The Daily Caller that the administration concluded
his client — who also has a master’s degree in public health —
should work at a “non-profit.” The federal government, he said,
put the doctor through a “bureaucratic labyrinth,” and eventually
restricted his job mobility once he was in the U.S.
“He
was eventually forced to be based in Europe,” Johnson told TheDC.
Only
85,000 skilled foreign workers, including doctors and those with
master’s degrees in technical subjects, are allowed in the U.S.
every year to fill jobs
in Silicon Valley, high-tech hospitals, and engineering firms. That’s
fewer than are needed: The U.S. continues to lag behind the rest of
the developed world in new graduates of university science,
technology and mathematics programs.
A
properly working guest worker program is “important to our economic
growth,” Michael Wildes, another New York immigration lawyer told
TheDC.
But
progressive think tanks like the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) and
other liberal interest groups are pressuring the administration to
drag its feet even more. The left claims foreign professionals are
being hired here because they are cheaper to employ than American
workers, and that U.S. employers like Siemens, Pfizer and others
treat them like indentured servants.
Foreigners,
they say, are often hired before Americans are given the chance to
interview for a job. “Many firms exploit these loopholes for
competitive advantage and profit, at the expense of American workers
and the American economy,” Ron Hira, an EPI research associate,
wrote
in a recent U.S. News & World Report op-ed.
Meanwhile,
a bi-partisan bill to bolster business
worker immigration, sponsored by Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin and
Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley, languishes in the U.S. Senate.
At
a time of persistent high unemployment in the U.S. and increasing
public concern about immigration and border control, liberal policy
wonks argue, Congress may be receptive to the idea that the law
should require employers to offer Americans jobs before offering them
to foreign nationals.
On
the opposite end of the policy spectrum is the argument that
reforming America’s “guest worker” program would prevent the
U.S. economy from falling even further behind.
The
guest
worker program, overseen
by U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services inside the Department
of Homeland Security, includes the “H-1B” guest worker visas, “L”
visas for foreign employees of U.S. companies, and “O” visas for
those the government considers “extraordinarily” talented.
Johnson
worries that it has been more than a decade since business
immigration visa law was last brought up to date.
“Nowadays,
with outsourcing so common,” he told TheDC, “those jobs can
primarily be lost to other nations, or the U.S. company can operates
overseas.”
Allowing
the immigration of more skilled managers who already work for
technology employers like Microsoft or IBM, says the American
Immigration Lawyers Association, would also be good for the American
economy.
“Individuals
are coming to establish a new entity related to their employer
abroad, thus planting a seed of opportunity for U.S. workers,” AILA
president Eleanor Pelta said.
Johnson
claimed that rather than seeing this shortcoming as an economic
development issue, the Obama administration and liberals in Congress
are postponing change in order to make it part of “comprehensive
immigration reform,” a strategy that would include an amnesty
proposal for illegal
aliens.
“When
there are enough qualified U.S. applicants, the government can reduce
the number of visas available,” he explained. “But if we ignore
the shortages — in engineering, IT and medicine — a U.S. company
will set up operations outside the U.S., or outsource the job, and we
will have lost another taxpayer.”
No comments:
Post a Comment