Why
would the White House consider
Susan Sarandon a security risk?
By
Hollie
McKay
Published
April 24, 2012
FoxNews.com
“We
know we’re under surveillance, I’ve had my phone tapped,”
Sarandon told the audience during a question and answer session at
New York’s Tribeca Film Festival. She also said she had twice seen
a file the government holds on her by filing Freedom of Information
requests.
A
rep for Sarandon did not respond to FoxNews.com's request for further
comment, and government officials are staying mum on the matter, too.
So why, as Sarandon claims, would the feds would want to keep the
Oscar-winner on close watch, and out of the White House all together?
"We
know we’re under surveillance, I’ve had my phone tapped"
-
Susan Sarandon
“Based
on her history of activism and outspoken nature in pursuing her
agenda, it makes sense that the White House would be leery about her
motives for a White House visit,” Michael Wildes, an immigration
lawyer at New York-based Wildes & Weinberg, told FOX411’s Pop
Tarts. “Her motivation to bring this out is more than likely about
her political agenda more so than it is her looking for attention.
But, wire taps do not necessarily have to be indicative of someone
that is a serious security threat, especially in the Patriot Act
era.”
Sarandon’s
liberal activism has spanned over four decades. She has also put her
celebrity behind several Democratic presidential hopefuls, including
John Kerry and John Edwards; called for elections to be monitored by
international authorities; vehemently protested against the invasion
of Iraq; and rallied for the withdrawal of U.S. troops overseas.
Most
recently, Sarandon came under fire for referring
to
Pope
Benedict XVI as a ‘Nazi,’ and spoke out in support of the Occupy
Wall Street movement. But given that President Obama is running for
reelection, some say it is in his best interests to distance himself
from the “Dead Man Walking” star.
“By
any objective standard, Susan is an extremist. Her far-left activism
would have resulted in her being labeled a ‘subversive’ in
decades past, and she is not someone Mr. Obama and his administration
are likely to want to associate with given the upcoming election,”
said California-based attorney, David Wohl. “Sarandon’s recent
labeling of the Pope as a ‘Nazi’ could result in severe damage to
the President’s re-election prospects with Catholic voters should
he invite her to the White House."
Sarandon
may also conside her self-suggested status as a security threat a
boon to her activist reputation.
“If
true, it’s a badge of honor in her circles,” noted Jason Maloni
of Levick Strategic Communications. “Plus I expect she’s not
applying for a government job anytime soon."
No comments:
Post a Comment